Clarify Identity-Specific Rigor description

Refine the phrasing in the Future Work section to enhance clarity.
This commit is contained in:
Levi Neely 2026-05-02 14:30:21 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent 2bd0a45271
commit b0be365f88
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -4314,6 +4314,6 @@ The CLI developer has been advised that `weather.GetWeather` will transition fro
## Future Work / Next Steps
1. **Protocol Refinement**: Implement and test a "Lead/Follower" coordination model in JIT-generated identities. One agent should be designated as the final decision maker for shared components (e.g., API interfaces) to resolve consultative deadlocks.
2. **Identity-Specific Rigor**: Consider introducing a "pragmatism" toggle or specialized base agents (e.g., ) that balance the extreme rigor of the suckless Philosophy with the need for multi-agent progress.
2. **Identity-Specific Rigor**: Consider introducing a "pragmatism" toggle or specialized base agents (e.g., ) that balance extreme rigor with the need for multi-agent progress.
3. **Automated Handoffs**: Formalize the prompt-file notification system into a standard library/pattern for subagents, reducing the need for hand-written coordination instructions in every JIT prompt.
4. **Integration Testing**: Future trials should include a dedicated "Integration" subagent whose sole job is to run builds/tests across all modules, independent of the module-specific developers and reviewers.