From b0be365f88ac60dd0efc6c7516ee2b7ba4191290 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Levi Neely <141506390+lneely@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2026 14:30:21 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Clarify Identity-Specific Rigor description

Refine the phrasing in the Future Work section to enhance clarity.
---
 experiments/TRIAL_2.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/experiments/TRIAL_2.md b/experiments/TRIAL_2.md
index c583b9a..25f8ac8 100644
--- a/experiments/TRIAL_2.md
+++ b/experiments/TRIAL_2.md
@@ -4314,6 +4314,6 @@ The CLI developer has been advised that `weather.GetWeather` will transition fro
 ## Future Work / Next Steps
 
 1. **Protocol Refinement**: Implement and test a "Lead/Follower" coordination model in JIT-generated identities. One agent should be designated as the final decision maker for shared components (e.g., API interfaces) to resolve consultative deadlocks.
-2. **Identity-Specific Rigor**: Consider introducing a "pragmatism" toggle or specialized base agents (e.g., ) that balance the extreme rigor of the suckless Philosophy with the need for multi-agent progress.
+2. **Identity-Specific Rigor**: Consider introducing a "pragmatism" toggle or specialized base agents (e.g., ) that balance extreme rigor with the need for multi-agent progress.
 3. **Automated Handoffs**: Formalize the prompt-file notification system into a standard library/pattern for subagents, reducing the need for hand-written coordination instructions in every JIT prompt.
 4. **Integration Testing**: Future trials should include a dedicated "Integration" subagent whose sole job is to run builds/tests across all modules, independent of the module-specific developers and reviewers.