Add spawn_subagents.py tool example to README

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Levi Neely 2026-04-10 03:12:59 +02:00
parent 5eb93f181b
commit c00129a488
1 changed files with 88 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -301,6 +301,94 @@ func killSession(sid string) {
Each goroutine spawns, primes, waits, and cleans up independently. The only serialised step is session creation, to avoid a race between snapshotting existing sessions and detecting the new one.
The same pattern works as a reusable agent tool. `spawn_subagents.py` reads a JSON spec from stdin, fans out the work concurrently, and returns a JSON array of results — a single `execute_tool` call from the parent's perspective. Note: this requires adding Python language support to `execute_code`, `execute_tool`, and `execute_pipe`, which is low effort.
```python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""spawn_subagents.py — fan out tasks to ephemeral olliesrv sub-agents.
Input (stdin): JSON array of {"task": str, "agent": str, "context": str}
Output (stdout): JSON array of {"agent": str, "reply": str}
Install in $OLLIE_TOOLS_PATH to make available via execute_tool.
"""
import json, os, sys, threading, time
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor, as_completed
from pathlib import Path
BASE = Path.home() / "mnt" / "ollie"
POLL = 0.5
_spawn_lock = threading.Lock()
def session_ids():
return {e.name for e in BASE.iterdir() if e.is_dir()}
def spawn_session(agent="default"):
with _spawn_lock:
before = session_ids()
(BASE / "ctl").write_text(f"new agent={agent}\n")
while True:
new = session_ids() - before
if new:
return new.pop()
time.sleep(0.1)
def kill_session(sid):
(BASE / "ctl").write_text(f"kill {sid}\n")
def wait_reply(sid):
path = BASE / sid / "reply"
while True:
if path.stat().st_size > 0:
return path.read_text().strip()
time.sleep(POLL)
def run_subagent(spec):
agent = spec.get("agent", "default")
context = spec.get("context", "")
task = spec.get("task", "")
sid = spawn_session(agent)
try:
prompt = f"{context}\n\n{task}".strip() if context else task
(BASE / sid / "prompt").write_text(prompt)
return {"agent": agent, "reply": wait_reply(sid)}
finally:
kill_session(sid)
def main():
specs = json.load(sys.stdin)
results = [None] * len(specs)
with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=len(specs)) as pool:
futures = {pool.submit(run_subagent, s): i for i, s in enumerate(specs)}
for f in as_completed(futures):
results[futures[f]] = f.result()
json.dump(results, sys.stdout, indent=2)
print()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
```
The parent agent constructs the spec and makes a single tool call:
```json
[
{ "task": "review this code for correctness", "agent": "reviewer", "context": "..." },
{ "task": "check this code for security issues", "agent": "security", "context": "..." }
]
```
Results come back as:
```json
[
{ "agent": "reviewer", "reply": "..." },
{ "agent": "security", "reply": "..." }
]
```
### Self-Generating Workflows
Since agents have access to `execute_code`, a session can write and execute a workflow script without any human involvement. Given a task and knowledge of the filesystem layout, an agent can decompose the work, spawn sessions, write the coordination script, and run it — all in a single turn. The README you are reading is essentially its system prompt. Conductor functionality, for free.