Rename to Ideas; add self-generating workflows section
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a713760f27
commit
6db891bbb1
|
|
@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ echo myagent > ~/mnt/ollie/<session-id>/agent
|
||||||
echo "kill <session-id>" > ~/mnt/ollie/ctl
|
echo "kill <session-id>" > ~/mnt/ollie/ctl
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Possible Applications
|
## Ideas
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Automation & Scripting
|
### Automation & Scripting
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -196,6 +196,10 @@ done
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Each agent only sees what the script explicitly sends it. Each can use a different backend, model, or tool configuration. A human can intervene at any point by writing directly to a session's `prompt`. The boundary between fully automated and human-in-the-loop is just whether the script pauses to ask.
|
Each agent only sees what the script explicitly sends it. Each can use a different backend, model, or tool configuration. A human can intervene at any point by writing directly to a session's `prompt`. The boundary between fully automated and human-in-the-loop is just whether the script pauses to ask.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Self-Generating Workflows
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Since agents have access to `execute_code`, a session can write and execute a workflow script without any human involvement. Given a task and knowledge of the filesystem layout, an agent can decompose the work, spawn sessions, write the coordination script, and run it — all in a single turn. The README you are reading is essentially its system prompt. Conductor functionality, for free.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Example shell session
|
## Example shell session
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```sh
|
```sh
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue