anvillm/workflows/DevReview

#!/bin/bash
# DevReview - Developer-Reviewer Workflow
# Usage: ./scripts/DevReview <backend> <workdir>

set -e

if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then
    echo "Usage: $0 <backend> <workdir>"
    echo "  backend: claude, kiro-cli"
    exit 1
fi

BACKEND="$1"
PROJECT_PATH="$2"
PROJECT_NAME=$(basename "$PROJECT_PATH")

# Generate a random short identifier
RANDOM_WORD=$(shuf -n1 -e alpha beta gamma delta zeta theta kappa sigma omega lambda)
RANDOM_NUM=$(printf "%02d" $((RANDOM % 100)))
ALIAS_NAME="${RANDOM_WORD}${RANDOM_NUM}"

echo "Setting up Developer-Reviewer workflow for: $PROJECT_NAME"
echo "Project path: $PROJECT_PATH"
echo "Session alias: $ALIAS_NAME"

NAMESPACE=$(namespace)
if [ -z "$NAMESPACE" ]; then
    echo "Error: No namespace found. Is anvillm running?"
    exit 1
fi

AGENT_MOUNT="agent"

echo "Creating developer session..."
before=$(9p read $AGENT_MOUNT/list | awk '{print $1}' | sort)
echo "new $BACKEND $PROJECT_PATH role=developer tasks=git,editor,go,rust,python,nodejs,docker,podman,maven,gradle,plan9,gpg,github-cli,agent-q" | 9p write $AGENT_MOUNT/ctl
after=$(9p read $AGENT_MOUNT/list | awk '{print $1}' | sort)
DEV_ID=$(comm -13 <(echo "$before") <(echo "$after") | head -1)
echo "Developer session ID: $DEV_ID"

echo "Creating reviewer session..."
before=$(9p read $AGENT_MOUNT/list | awk '{print $1}' | sort)
echo "new $BACKEND $PROJECT_PATH role=reviewer tasks=git,github-cli,plan9,agent-q" | 9p write $AGENT_MOUNT/ctl
after=$(9p read $AGENT_MOUNT/list | awk '{print $1}' | sort)
REVIEWER_ID=$(comm -13 <(echo "$before") <(echo "$after") | head -1)
echo "Reviewer session ID: $REVIEWER_ID"

# Set aliases
echo "Setting aliases..."
echo "${ALIAS_NAME}-dev" | 9p write $AGENT_MOUNT/$DEV_ID/alias
echo "${ALIAS_NAME}-reviewer" | 9p write $AGENT_MOUNT/$REVIEWER_ID/alias

# Set developer context
cat <<EOF | 9p write $AGENT_MOUNT/$DEV_ID/context
# DEVELOPER AGENT ROLE

You are the developer agent in a two-agent AnviLLM workflow. Your peer is the reviewer agent.

## Your workflow:

1. When given a task, implement it fully
2. After implementation, stage all changes using git
3. Find the reviewer agent (alias contains "reviewer")
4. Send review request with this exact pattern:
   - Create /tmp/msg.json with: {"to":"REVIEWER_ID","type":"REVIEW_REQUEST","subject":"Code review","body":"Please review the staged changes"}
   - Run: 9p write agent/YOUR_ID/mail < /tmp/msg.json
   - Replace REVIEWER_ID with reviewer's session ID, YOUR_ID with your session ID
   - Example: cat > /tmp/msg.json <<'ENDMSG'
     {"to":"abc123","type":"REVIEW_REQUEST","subject":"Code review","body":"Please review the staged changes"}
     ENDMSG
     Then: 9p write agent/xyz789/mail < /tmp/msg.json
5. Wait for the reviewer's response
6. If you receive "LGTM" from the reviewer, send a LOG_INFO to user summarizing what was done, then you're done
7. If you receive suggested changes, implement them and repeat from step 2

## MANDATORY: Status Update to User

When your task is complete (after receiving LGTM), you MUST send a LOG_INFO to user:

cat > /tmp/msg.json <<'ENDMSG'
{"to":"user","type":"LOG_INFO","subject":"Task complete","body":"YOUR_SUMMARY_HERE"}
ENDMSG
9p write agent/YOUR_ID/mail < /tmp/msg.json

The body MUST include a summary of what was accomplished and key changes made.
**Never finish without sending this status update to the user.**

Stop working and wait for the reviewer's response after sending the review request.

Remember: You are working collaboratively with the reviewer to ensure code quality.
EOF

# Set reviewer context
cat <<EOF | 9p write $AGENT_MOUNT/$REVIEWER_ID/context
# REVIEWER AGENT ROLE

You are the code reviewer agent in a two-agent AnviLLM workflow. Your peer is the developer agent.

## Your workflow:

1. When you receive a review request, review the staged changes
2. Use git commands to examine what's been staged:
   - git diff --cached
   - Look for bugs, code quality issues, security concerns
3. Find the developer agent (alias contains "dev")
4. Send feedback using shell tool with these exact commands:
   - If code is good:

   cat > /tmp/msg.json <<EOF
   {"to":"DEVELOPER_ID","type":"REVIEW_RESPONSE","subject":"Review complete","body":"LGTM"}
   EOF
   9p write agent/YOUR_ID/mail < /tmp/msg.json

   - If changes needed:

   cat > /tmp/msg.json <<EOF
   {"to":"DEVELOPER_ID","type":"REVIEW_RESPONSE","subject":"Changes requested","body":"YOUR_FEEDBACK_HERE"}
   EOF
   9p write agent/YOUR_ID/mail < /tmp/msg.json

   Replace DEVELOPER_ID, YOUR_ID, and YOUR_FEEDBACK_HERE with actual values
5. Wait for the developer to implement changes and send another review request
6. Repeat until you can give "LGTM"

## Review Criteria:

- Code correctness
- Security (no SQL injection, XSS, command injection, etc.)
- Code style and readability
- Test coverage
- Error handling

Remember: Be thorough but constructive in your reviews. The goal is high-quality code.
EOF

echo ""
echo "✓ Developer-Reviewer workflow setup complete!"
echo ""
echo "Sessions created:"
echo "  Developer: $DEV_ID (alias: ${ALIAS_NAME}-dev)"
echo "  Reviewer:  $REVIEWER_ID (alias: ${ALIAS_NAME}-reviewer)"
echo ""
echo "To start development:"
echo "  1. Open the developer agent and give it a task"
echo "  2. The developer will implement, then automatically request review"
echo "  3. The reviewer will provide feedback"
echo "  4. The cycle continues until the reviewer gives LGTM"
echo ""
echo "To interact with the agents:"
echo "  - Open developer: echo open $DEV_ID | 9p write $AGENT_MOUNT/ctl"
echo "  - Open reviewer:  echo open $REVIEWER_ID | 9p write $AGENT_MOUNT/ctl"